Author’s Note: I am, generally, a very big proponent of the United States of America. I think it is a strong net positive for the world, especially in the last 100 years or so. This article is very critical of what the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed in the early 1960s, and this raised concerns about unchecked power before and since then. Checking that power makes the idea of America stronger, and strengthens responsible governments everywhere. I bring this to stark light in hopes of strengthening America and similar democracies, not weakening them.
In the early 1960s, my father was in Fort Pierce, Florida, about 2 hours north of Miami. He remembers long convoys of military trucks and even tanks coming down US-1 in order to be prepared for a Cuban attack.
In April 1961, the CIA (with money given them for this purpose by President Kennedy) used Cuban expatriates to invade Cuba at the Bay of Pigs to depose Fidel Castro. The CIA even used B-26 bombers to provide air support. After some initial success in the first days, the world found out about the ongoing invasion. At this point, Kennedy pulled further air support, and the anti-Castro American-backed forces were surrounded and captured in three days. Castro, who had allied with the Soviet Union when he came to power in 1958, was strengthened as a leader, having led the successful counter-invasion.
This sad failure is a big part of the backdrop that precipitated the infamous memo known as Operation Northwoods.
The Northwoods Memo
On March 5, 1962, the Joint Chiefs1 asked the secretaries of the military branches to formulate a plan that would help to publicly justify a full US military invasion of Cuba. They proposed to use false and violent pretenses.
The link to the full memo (which was declassified in 1997) can be found at this link. You can read it in full in about 7 or 8 minutes. This article will show many key sections of this memo. Note that “Operation Mongoose” is mentioned throughout the memo. This is is the much larger and broader multi-agency mission of the US to depose Castro and end Cuba’s strong association with the Soviet Union, through many different sets of means. Project Northwoods, if enacted, would be a major escalation in Operation Mongoose.
As is clear from the first page above, the goal is to escalate the effort to depose Castro into using direct US military force. But in order to justify this domestically (and perhaps also in the eyes of the global community), consent for war must be manufactured. This manufacturing of consent has been done in many ways in many countries, from subtle propaganda to direct lies to violent false flags.
In this case, the Joint Chiefs recommended deceptive violence.
False Flags at Guantanamo Bay
The first focus of the memo in terms of actions is focused around the already-existing military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The plan was to start with rumors, and then stage a series of false flag attacks on the Guantanamo Bay US military base, making it look like Cubans were performing escalating attacks (taken from pages 7 & 8 of the Northwoods Memo):
The reference to napthalene means a fire-bombing and may also indicate using napthalene with palmitate — napalm. More importantly, the end goal of sending in “large scale United States military operations” based on completely fabricated events is quite disturbing.
But it is not the most disturbing part.
Faking Airplane Crashes
Another action recommended by the Joint Chiefs in the memo was to fake the loss of part of a US squadron of airplanes near Cuba. A detailed plan of deception was proposed (page 11):
The deception would be made even more realistic by releasing airplane parts into the ocean near the coast of Cuba via American submarine:
Even worse than this, the Joint Chiefs also proposed faking the in-flight destruction of a civilian aircraft (by switching passengers to an alternate flight and shooting down a drone that looks like a civilian charter flight).
Then they would shoot down the civilian flight (the drone, not the one with people on it) and insist the Cuban military had shot down a plane full of US civilians.
And it gets even worse:
Actual Attacks On Neighboring Countries
The Joint Chiefs also suggested creating copies of Soviet planes and using them to attack civilian ships (page 9):
In addition, it was suggested by the head of the US military to the President of the United States that these fake Cuban/Soviet planes be used to firebomb other countries, like the Dominican Republic (page 9):
All this to justify US invasion of Cuba.
It may be hard to digest, hard to believe, but it gets even worse:
Fake Domestic Terror Attacks
This single sentence is one of the darker episode of US military history (bottom of page 8):
My Dad was in one of those other Florida cities.
The absolute callousness of the mindset of these generals is illustrated by their suggestion to sink a boatload of Cuban refugees “real or simulated”. Real, or simulated. Here is the passage, from page 9:
This is darkness. Thankfully, President Kennedy chose to not act on the recommendations of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
I would emphasize yet again, that this was not just some set of hypotheticals as part of a brainstorming session. The heads of the US military recommended that some or all of these actions actually be implemented. They recommended to do so unanimously.
Most people are aware that our military and the CIA performed many distasteful acts throughout history. I won’t list them all here. But the utter callousness and unanimity of these recommendations needs to be stared at in the face. This is what unchecked power looks like.
Thankfully, in this case, it did end up getting checked by the President.
We know things of this type happened in the 1930s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, and probably in the last two decades as well. We may want to comfort ourselves that “things are different now.”
But keep in mind that there has never been a single instance of disciplinary or legal action against people that suggested or performed any of these types of plans.
Which means we have no reason to believe they have stopped. The Operation Northwoods memo wasn’t declassified until 35 years after it was presented to the President.
So it is our responsibility as Americans to create a realistic understanding of the possible mindset and capabilities of these black operations. We should push our lawmakers and journalists to keep track of and limit these government thought processes and especially these government actions. In this age of information, we as citizens can also help monitor our government. If you live in a different country, do you really think your government has not done similar things?
It is our responsibility. To the extent that we do not become the watcher of the powerful, we are complicit.
In the US Military, the Joint Chiefs of Staff are the single heads of each of the branches of the military. At the time, this meant the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.
I'm afraid Operation Northwoods isn't quite what it seems to be. If you examine the collection of documents as a whole it is obvious they are nonsensical in a number of ways which completely undermines their authenticity.
--- The very important Decision document is blackened and almost illegible and when you examine its contents they do not add up.
--- The document content does not match title, eg, a Report is a request, the very important Decision document is titled a Note, the content of the so-called Appendix and Annex do not fit those document types, notably the Annex which contains the very important Pretexts, a listing of all the planned false-flag actions. Nor do the documents relate to each other correctly, eg, the Annex is attached to the Appendix while the Appendix is a duplicate of a memorandum which itself is given the label Enclosure A but only one document lists an enclosure which matches neither the documents labelled Enclosure A or Enclosure B.
--- Reference is made to a recently-dated memorandum from a “General Craig” who can only reasonably refer to Lieutenant General Edward A. Craig who retired from military service on 1 June 1951.
--- The second paragraph in the very brief, three-paragraph Decision document
”In that the Commandant had expressed direct concern of the Marine Corps in this matter, the provisions of Title 10, US Code 141 (c) applied and were followed.
is plainly gobbledygook. The Commandant is a naval position in charge of training and this proposal is ostensibly for a real life operation while Title 10, US Code doesn’t have a (c), only an (a) and (b) and simply specifies that there is the position, Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the duties entailed.
Perhaps the mention of Commandant, the position in charge of training, is an oblique reference to the fact that the Pretexts document was really an intelligence training exercise and the surrounding documents have been dummied up to create a document used for the propaganda purposes discussed below.
If Operation Northwoods is a clearly faked proposed false-flag attack what is the purpose of this fakery? It was de-classified (although stamped UNCLASSIFIED) in 1998, just three years before 9/11 - rather significant, no? This article explains the propaganda agenda of ON.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/operation-northwoods-false-flag-proposal
Great article Joshua. Thank yo again for making my morning more interesting.